Saturday, 16 April 2022

The Battle for Freitag's Farm - A Live Free Or Die Playtest

Over the past week or so, I've been mulling over getting in a trial game of the LFoD rules that I bought earlier in the year. So after perusing the scenarios in the book, I cobbled something together, using some historical OOB as a guide and the Germantown map for inspiration for the table layout. Nothing fancy or even attempting to be balanced, other than that both sides had the same quality of commanders. I did add in a mix of a few 1st Class and 4th Class units, just to see how they fared.

Red (British) OOB
General Rating 4 + 2 Stars
Lieutenant + 1 Star
Guards Bde
2 x 1st Class Line Infantry
Line Bde
3 x 2nd Class Line Infantry
Line Bde
3 x 2nd Class Line Infantry
1 x 2nd Class Skirmishers
1 x 2nd Class Light Gun

Blue (American) OOB
General Rating 4 + 2 Stars
Lieutenant + 1 Star
Line Bde
3 x 3rd Class Line Infantry
Line Bde
2 x 3rd Class Line Infantry
1 x 3rd Class Skirmishers
1 x Light Gun
Line Bde
2 x 3rd Class Line Infantry
Mixed Bde
2 x 4th Class Militia
2 x 3rd Class Cavalry

Scenario
Again, nothing at all complicated, with an advance to contact with the nominal objective being control of Freitag's farm and the crossroads.

An overview of the table, with Blue to the South, Red to the North. All units are deployed in column of march, with the exception of the skirmish screens, to gain from the movement bonus for this formation.

The end of Turn 1. Both sides used their Command Points (CP's) to make brigade moves forward. Blue won the Initiative and chose to move first

The end of Turn 2. CP's were even for both sides, but Red won the Initiative and moved first, allowing their skirmishers to occupy Freitag's farm. Blue responded by changing one brigade in the centre into line, thus accruing demoralized (dmz's) for changing formation. they were too close to the enemy to rally these off at the end of the Turn.

The central Blue brigade changes into line, covered by their skirmishers.

Red has beaten Blue to the farmhouse.

The end of Turn 3. Again even Steven's on the CP front and again Red chose to move first. Both sides used their CP's for movement, with the Generals attaching themselves to their skirmishers to boost their shooting dice. Sod's Law that both sides then failed to hit!

The Blue units fan out on their right flank to try and bypass the farm, with the cavalry in the lead (top right hand corner). Red have refused their flank at the top of the fenced field. The Red troops are the 1st Class brigade, whilst the Blue on the extreme right and 4th Class.

On the other flank, both sides have moved into line where possible, although one Red regiment does not have space to deploy, so remains in column.

The end of Turn 4. Honours once again even on the CP front, but Red chose for Blue to move first, having won the Initiative. There is some shooting, mainly by the skirmishers in and around the farm. Little damage done other than the Red General taking a hit and dropping down the a Rating of 2, from 4. This will hamper Red's ability to exercise effective C&C.

Both sides begin to exchange fire.

The Blue skirmishers unware they have winged the Red General.

The Blue 4th Class brigade moves up to pressure the Red 1st Class brigade.

The end of Turn 5. Blue has an advantage on the CP front and both sides use these to Rally off some DMZ's at critical points along the front. Shooting continues across the front with casualties beginning to mount up. The Blue brigade in the centre moves through their skirmish screen to bring greater firepower to bear on the farm.

Blue look to turn Red's flank by the farm.

The 4th Class brigade, supported by cavalry, close in on the Red 1st Class brigade.

Units are close to losing bases on this flank. Who will break first?

The end of Turn 6. With the CP's once again shared, Blue won the Initiative and chose for Red to move first. The Generals and Lieutenants were busy moving about and Rallying off DMZ's and attaching themselves to parts of their respective lines that needed them most. Both sides lost bases but all units easily passed the Morale tests, so there were no retreats.

The Red brigade advances to put pressure on the Blue brigade that has begun to lose bases.

The firefight and movement continues around Freitag's farm. Red are struggling to get their units to bring their full firepower to bear.

Blue cannot gain enough of an advantage to mount an assault on the farm.

The end of Turn 7. A similar story of rallying as before, but Blue won the Initiative and chose to move first. Red then in a do or die move charged with their 1st Class brigade into the Blue 4th Class one. Carnage ensued! Elsewhere Blue lost bases which caused further losses and some retreats. Suddenly the Blue situation looked precarious.

Blue lost their supporting artillery which caused a Blue regiment (bottom right hand corner of the fence) to lose more bases. Suddenly Red had a huge advantage in numbers on this flank.

Both sides had regiments close to losing a base, but not enough to cause any problems in the centre.

As Blue pushed forward across the fenced field...

... on their left the infantry brigade had evaporated like Summer mist.



End of Game
At this point I had to call the game as time was against me, which was a shame. Another Turn or two would have been interesting, to see if Blue could salvage anything from the situation and like wise, whether Red could capitalise on the sudden collapse on Blue's flanks.

Post Game Thoughts
All-in-all the game took about two hours to play, which was not bad given it was my first go with these rules. The QRS was fine for 90% of the game, with the rulebook being used just to clarify some issues early on. Well, in the end, what did I think of the game? well I made notes as I went along, so in no particular order:

  • Brigade moves are very important to keep troops moving for minimal CP's expended. I imagine in larger games as units retreat and this cohesion is broken, then it would be imperative to try and regain the 3" cohesion of brigades.
  • Units move very fast compared to other games I've played, so contact is gained pretty quickly if you want to. Of course you do not need to make full use of your movement allowance, but early on it's probably a good things, as shown when the Red skirmishers beat Blue to occupying the farmhouse.
  • Terrain penalties are easy to remember, which is good. However I did have to check for moving through woods which I found in the rulebook fairly easy. Again this is a simple penalty, to not one which you are likely to forget.
  • Units can be rifle armed but as far as I could see, it didn't state which one, so I simply decided the skirmished would be the only units thus equipped.
  • Even in this simple and pretty small game, there is little room for units to manouevre and deploy into line, even when using units that are only 4 bases wide. I think the largest unit is 9 bases wide! So depending upon the scenario, it is probably worth starting with units already deployed where possible.
  • The rules themselves are very easy to pick up and remember and feel very intuitive, so I spent most of the game focusing on that, rather than the rulebook, which is not bad thing.
  • You need LOTS of dice or marker to depict DMZ's on units. In this game I used over 20 (the red dice seen in the photos) but would require more for larger games.
  • I can see no ability for artillery to be manhandled once deployed. Easy enough to fix but worth noting. As with other 18thC games, getting your artillery deployed correctly as the start is pretty important. In this game most of the time was spent in counter battery fire, which is no bad thing of course.
  • The coloured brigade markers in the scenarios are a must for bigger game so you can keep track of which regiment belongs to which brigade as unit cohesion begins to break down, due to the importance in terms of allocating CP's as outlined above.
  • You never seem to have enough CP's once action is joined!
  • For some reason, probably sue to space limitations, there is no morale section on the QRS. I will simply copy the on from the book and stick it to the back of one the QRS' from the rulebook.
  • The British bayonet charge was devastating to see in action, with the Red's rolling 13 dice against Blue's 1. Hardly surprising that Blue then lost!
  • Once in action in this game the 12" rule to be far enough away from the enemy to rally of DMZ's really didn't happen. You could house rule it that LOS would be required to limit this, but I think there is then the risk that units just keep rallying of DMZ's almost ad infinitum, this markedly affecting the game.
  • Use of the Generals and Lieutenants during the game requires careful thought. they can make a difference in that they add +3D6 to a combat or shooting, but run the risk of being harmed, as happened to the Red General at the farm. This adds a nice level of thought and C&C to the game on what is quite a nice and simple, but simplistic rules engine

So there we have it, the first trial game played and a lot of fun had. I imagine the game will feel much better against an opponent, with the placing of CP's and commanders etc coming nicely to the fore as well as deciding who should move first or not, as the case may be.

Am I happy with my purchase? Most certainly I am. Do they provide a better game than say BPII for the AWI? More games are required to be perfectly honest before I can make that call. They do certainly give a good game though.

Moving forward the only fly in the ointment so to speak are the large number of bases required for pretty much all of the scenarios. It would be nice to play some of the larger ones but currently I do not have anywhere near enough to do so. So as mentioned before, the plan is to play some generic scenarios to really get a hang of the rules, which will then allow me to get a better idea of how to rate Generals, unit Classes etc. Something to look forward to though.

So with two glorious days in a row of Spring weather here in Bristol, with another due tomorrow, it only remains for me to wish you all a very Happy Easter and I hope you don't eat too many Easter eggs. I'll try to be good but by God do I love Cadbury's mini Easter eggs!

17 comments:

  1. I think I commented on Battle 77 (but could be mistaken) that these rules seem to be very popular at the moment Steve. Thanks as always for the in depth AAR and your post game thoughts. They do seem to gave some good elements in them. I have only played Black Powder occasionally and found them a bit average to be honest...although I know they are quite popular!
    I hope you and your family enjoy a happy Easter...my favourite of all eggs in the standard sized milk chocolate with the white and yellow filling....when I was about ten, my mate and I once spent 50p buying a dozen of them...they were 4p each at the time 😄

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can imagine them making their debut at some shows this year as they are very easy to pick up and offer a good participation game for newbies, which is what they were initially designed for. I enjoy BPII but then most of my games use a very similar C&C mechanic.

      My brother loved Cabury's creme eggs when they first came out, but I was wearing braces at the time so nigh on impossible for me to bite into! Also they were too sickly sweet for me and I have a sweet tooth!

      Delete
  2. Very interesting Steve. Have you played Loose Files? They sound very similar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't played Loose Files Chris, but these rules are heavily based upon them and have been 'modernised' and some of the ambiguity taken out as it were. If you like Loose Files, then I'd stick with those unless you wanted to buy the scenarios, which are excellent.

      Delete
  3. And a happy Easter to you too Steve.
    Live Free or Die is probably not a rule set I will buy, but it’s still good to read your thoughts - just in case there are any rule mechanisms or concepts that can be stolen borrowed shamelessly cribbed for use in other games.
    Even this small (initial/test) game of LFoD still had quite a lot of bases on the table/battlefield. If I was tempted (as mentioned above, I’m not) then I would still have to go for something smaller. Still, it’s “horses for courses” and “each to their own”.
    What’s happening with your Operation Cygnet campaign? Is it on hiatus now? ☹️
    And finally - I cannot fault your assessment of Cadburys mini-eggs. They are indeed lovely.
    Cheers,
    Geoff

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Geoff! I think I had a tad too many bases for this first game, but then you only find this out by playing of course. Will I still play them in the future? I'm not sure, but will decide after a few more games. The scenarios though make for an excellent resource for other rules too.

      Operation Cygnet is waiting for some inspiration to get it onto the table to be honest. Recent lovely weather and the needs of the garden plus SWMBO being on holiday have meant little free time for anything else. Now the World snooker championship is on, I will have more free time in the evening whilst she watches this!

      Sir, you are indeed a connoisseur of Easter eggs!

      Delete
    2. I live in Sheffield and although the world snooker is effectively “on my doorstep” at the Crucible Theatre in Sheffield town centre, I have never been tempted to go along and watch.
      Of course, some people might regard playing with toy soldiers as being equally dull.
      They’d be wrong, obviously 😀😀

      Delete
    3. My wife likes golf too, but I view it in the vein of Mark Twain;). I must admit that I like watching cricket, having played it before, but playing is much better than watching. The same is true of wargaming IMHO.

      Delete
  4. The Battle of Freitag Farm seems appropriate for Germantown.

    Thanks for the playthrough of LFoD. Meeting engagements usually offer a good test when near equal forces meet. I am surprised both armies waited so long to deploy from march column.

    I vaguely remember Loose Files and American Scramble and also recall not caring for tracking DP accumulation. Think about it, I suppose tracking DPs is not much different from tracking Hits in Honours of War. Does LFoD still utilize Average Dice as did LFaAS?

    Hard to be tempted by another AWI set of rules when one is comfortable with the current set in play.

    Oh, Cadbury Caramel Eggs are a favorite here too. One of the first things Nancy buys when they become seasonally available.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome Jon. I was in two minds about whether and when to from column to line. As shooting is only 6" for muskets, you can get pretty close before having to deploy. You do have to be careful not to get caught whilst still in column of course.

      Tracking hits is no different really than HoW, but the number of bases and the frequency of DMZ's is quite marked. Whereas you don't take 'hits' from movement penalties in HoW, you do in LFoD, which is why the dice count is much higher. They have ditched the average dice and everything is D6 and pretty much requires a 5+ on any test, so much easier to remember.

      If you are happy with your current AWI rules, then I'd see no reason to change. I thought I'd give these a go to see how they played plus of course there are the scenarios and some of the monies go to the American Battlefields Trust, which is of course a good thing.

      It used to be the case that you would see Cadbury's creme eggs on sale just after Xmas, sometimes even before the New Year! Oh the joys of the consumer culture we are living in:(.

      Delete
  5. Intriguing report Steve. I don't know the rules, but it was helpful to read your report and get a flavour of them and your very good analysis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad the report was helpful Richard, which was really my aim with this AAR. It's good to know if the rules might be of interest before you shell out your hard earned cash.

      Delete
    2. Despite reviews, I am an easy mark for rules, so I might spring for a copy anyway!

      Delete
  6. Thanks for this detailed share Steve, I do like your ‘minimalist’ approach. I am spending some time thinking about a system for a very mobile game setup for the future ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Matt. The minimalist approach does make it easier for trialling rules, as you are not visually distracted to general emphemera that decorates a table top. There is also a certain old school charm to it I find.

      This sort of table does not require much terrain and with some of my other hills, all of it could fit in a shoe box more or less, with the exception of the mat and the figures. Again the latter fits in a box file and that's two forces at around 3-4 Brigades of Infantry and a similar amount of Cavalry Squadrons.

      Delete
  7. Thanks for the report and review!

    ReplyDelete